Tags
ACT, Adam and Eve, Associate Minister of Education, Darwin, evolution, first chapters of Genesis, Genesis, John Banks
On 20 August 2012, conservative evangelical New Zealand radio station, Radio Rhema, interviewed the Associate Minister of Education John Banks about the teaching of Creationism in schools. The interview follows the recent announcement of the plan by the free-market neoliberal ACT Party – of which Banks is the party leader and sole MP – to introduce private “Charter Schools” in New Zealand from 2014, many of which will be administered by evangelical Christian groups.
John Banks – New Zealand Associate Minister of Education and believer in Adam and Eve rather than in Evolution
While the interviewer wanted John Banks to tell him whether he supported the teaching of Creationism in schools, Banks attempted to steer the question to his own personal belief. On the question of his personal belief, Banks agreed that he believed in the story of Adam and Eve and did not accept the scientific fact of evolution.
His answer on teaching Creationism in schools was more cagey. He refused to make a clear statement that he supported the teaching of Creationism, referring obliquely to the liberal humanist enemy – possibly the “basket-weaving, hairy-legged feminists” whom he has often referred to – who would pounce on his words (“we have to be very, very careful about parading all this…”). But his comments on presenting ‘both sides’ of the issue removes all doubt that he wants Creationism to be taught in schools as a ‘scientific’ option.
Interviewer: As the Associate Minister of Education, how do you feel about schools teaching Creationism?
Banks: What do you mean? Can you just explain it to me so I clearly understand.
Interviewer: I guess your question back to me is fair, because there would be many different kinds of Creationism. There would be Intelligent Design, there would be long earthers, there would be short earthers. But I guess to nutshell it, to stereotypically nutshell it: that God created the world, that Darwin’s theory of evolution is not accurate, that God created Adam and Eve and that everything else has come from it. What do you think about schools teaching that…?
Banks: That’s what I believe! That’s what I believe. That’s what I believe. But I’m not going to impose my beliefs on other people, especially in this post-Christian society that we live in, especially in these lamentable times. I’m not going to be judgmental; I’m too old and have moved past that now. But I know what is important to me, I know what’s important to you, I know what’s important to our families, and I know what will make this country great again. But we have to be very, very careful about parading all this, because there are reactionaries out there, humanists in particular, that overrun the bureaucracy in Wellington and State education that you and I would be an anathema.
Interviewer: So let me get this clear, John Banks, Associate Minister of Education, you disagree with Darwin’s theory of evolution, you believe the Genesis account of how life began?
Banks: Yes.
Interviewer: Well how do you feel, therefore, about the other question: about evolution being taught in our schools?
Banks: Well I don’t have a problem. There are a lot of things taught in our schools that I don’t particularly like being taught in our schools. That’s where we’re at now….
Banks: … I don’t see anything wrong with a Christian school teaching Christianity and Adam and Eve and everything that follows.
Interviewer: And do you think there is a place to teach these opposing views equally? Darwin’s theory of evolution would not sit on an agreeable level with those who teach the six-day creation story, and vice-versa. Can two opposing views like that be taught on an equal level in our schools?
Banks: I don’t have any problem with schools teaching opposing views, because I think it is important that children have a rounded education. So I don’t have any problem with them teaching those opposing views. But what we must clearly understand is this country has moved on from a Christian country to a nation of humanism and a post-Christian society and all the attendant ills have followed. I don’t have a problem with people teaching what your faith is. My faith and your faith we share, but it is not the faith that other people might want to share….
The media report that circulated today summarised that John Banks “believes the Genesis account of the start of life on Earth” and that “he has no doubts the first chapters of Genesis are true”. This summary is easily misleading in respect of such a contested passage, as Banks is consistently vague about his precise understanding of Genesis, preferring to broadly agree with the interviewer. But Banks did make an affirmative response to the interviewer’s question of whether he “believed the Genesis account of how life began”. It is not clear that Banks believes in a literal six-day creation as Gavin Rumney suggests after reading the media report, or as Hemant Mehta does, or that he is a young earth creationist (believing that God made everything about 6000 years ago). GayNZ is cynical, entitling their blog post, “John Banks Believes in Talking Devil Tree-Snake !“
The Dunedin School 
It is really interesting to see Banks adopting the language of a ‘post-Christian’ culture, here as a criticism, and a way to try to paint Christians as a struggling minority, a trick he may have learned from American politicians and Christian pundits, who conveniently ignore the numerical and economic dominance of Christianity in the US.
In the more secularised New Zealand, Banks might have a few more legs to stand on than his American counterparts, but, if this really is a post-Christian culture, why are there still Creationists in such high-ranking positions?
Eric
“scientific fact of evolution”? Last I’d heard, evolution was still a theory.
So, you’re factually incorrect.
Every statement made as a result of the observation of nature is a “theory”, Carpentaro. The belief that the sun will rise in the sky tomorrow is a theory, dependent on the unprovable assumption that it will continue to do what it has done for many millennia. That the sun rises every day is a theory, but also a fact, just like evolution. You see, some of these theories have so much evidence going for them – such as the theory of sun rising and theory of evolution – that they are correctly labelled facts.
When evolutionists stop cheating and start with the original conditions, the original life form or common ancestor, and demonstrate for ALL to see that their claims are are true then they may have a point.
But as it stands, evolutionists are not being honest in their work and use everything but the only way they can prove their theory correct. As it stands all they have shown is how God’s creative work reacts when introduced to alien substances.